Expo32 has just recently been released and we have not had much time with it yet but so far, so good. It has many new features and has (hopefully) resolved some of the problems in Version 2. Our early take is that it is greatly improved. There is still much to be said for the System II software. Despite the now clunky DOS OS, they got many things right (especially regarding workflow for a clinical lab or research lab that runs the same panels repetitively). Albert D. Donnenberg, Ph.D. Phone: (412) 624-9596 Fax: (412) 624-9624 -----Original Message----- From: Tom Mc Closkey [mailto:thomasm@nshs.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 1:04 PM To: cyto-inbox Subject: Re: EXPOv2 - EXPO32 Marta.Borg@astrazeneca.com wrote: > > My question is, how can I know that EXPOv32 is better than EXPOv2 and why > should I pay once more when I newer got what I paid for from the beginning, > an adequate software? (And I made the mistake to by 12 copies!) > Is there anyone out there who has the same problem? > > Please all EXPO users, speak up! > Last summer, wanting to upgrade our DOS based computer on the Elite, we purchased a new EXPO workstation. We are also very disappointed with this software [ver 2] as it is a step back in many regards from the DOS based Elite software. When we communicated the deficiencies of this software to Coulter we were told that a new version was being developed. Still waiting. . . Tom **************************************************************************** * Thomas W. Mc Closkey, Ph. D., Director of Flow Cytometry North Shore University Hospital, New York University School of Medicine Boas Marks Biomedical Research Center, 350 Community Drive Manhasset, Long Island, New York 11030 ph: 516-562-4844 [office], 516-562-1135/4641 [lab] fax: 516-562-2866 **************************************************************************** *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:55:45 EST