RE: I got them compensation blues...

From: David.McFarland@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
Date: Tue Dec 28 1999 - 16:32:45 EST


I've seen the same thing on my FACSCalibur.  The problem is that the instrument
is compensating FL3/FL1 behind your back...without your knowledge... or
approval.  The nerve!  I can't tell you how it is done exactly, but FL1 is
compensated out of FL3 based on the amount of compensation of FL2-FL1 and
FL3-FL2.  I would much rather be able to do this on my own, but since FL1 signal
shouldn't (nudge, wink) spill into FL3, we are not given that capability with
the Calibur.   There's not really much you can do about it, except maybe run at
higher voltages on FL3 to try and keep the green population off the axis.  Have
you ever run GFP along with a red dye?  Then you really do need to compensate
FL1 from FL3.  Good luck.

David McFarland
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Flow Cytometry Facility
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
---------------------- Forwarded by David McFarland/VUMC/Vanderbilt on 12/28/99
03:13 PM ---------------------------





Bunny Cotleur <bcotleur@ohio.net> on 12/27/99 04:59:31 PM

Please respond to bcotleur@ohio.net
                                                                                
                                                                                
 (Embedded image moved to file: pic15454.pcx)From:(Embedded image moved to      
 file: pic06537.pcx)Bunny Cotleur <bcotleur@ohio.net> on 12/27/99 04:59 PM      
                                                                                


                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 To:      Cytometry Mailing List                              
          <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>                 
                                                              
 cc:      (bcc: David McFarland/VUMC/Vanderbilt)              
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 Subject: I got them compensation blues...                    
                                                              








Flow masters-

I am having a bit of a dilemma.  I haven't done any 3-color work in many
many years. And frankly, I don't recollect this issue cropping up
before.  What I am trying to do is fairly simple. I am multi- staining
human lymphocytes for various chemokine receptors simultaneous with CD4
and CD8.   I have the following mixes (set up by someone in the labs,
who's work I am extending):

CD4-PERCP/CD8-FITC/CHEMOKINE*-PE
CD4-PERCP/CD8-PE/CHEMOKINE*-FITC

(I am staining for several chemokine receptors, the exact ones not
important here).

Now here is my simple problem that is dragging me down into absolute
madness.  When I PROPERLY compensate Fl1/Fl2
(I say properly,as I have followed Mario's web instructions TO THE
LETTER.  Except for all the crazy math that is making my head spin :-)
).... I get frustrated.    When FICT/PE are comp'd fine, then PE is
smack in quadrant 2 looking at PE vs Fl3.  So, OK- I comp FL2/Fl3.
Picture perfect.   Go back to Fl1 vs Fl3.    AAARRRGGHHH!  Green is now
way overcomp'd to the X axis.  Let's just get scientific and say really
SQUOOSHED down.    I have been going back and for with this for days.
Different sample sources. Titering down the Ab's.    I call BD and they
say maybe my instrument is "too sensitive".   HUH???   Is that possible?
I thought that was IDEAL.   IN the meantime, I also note that %CD8 FITC
is NOT equal to  %CD8PE  in the same sample.  (Both sources=BD, both
used as they recommend.  Both also titred down to 2ul, no difference).
Now I'm starting to feel that I need to surrender my "License to Flow"
due to acute ignorance.
MAYDAY!
(***white flag is flapping in the breeze**)
--


Bunny Cotleur

Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Neurosciences /  NC30

216-444-1164





******************************************************************
When you do something, you should burn yourself completely, like a good
bonfire, leaving no trace of yourself.
(Shunryu Suzuki)



>From daemon@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu Wed Dec 29 03:52:59 1999 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA17275 for kelley; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 03:52:59 -0500 Received: from clbin01 (www.clb.nl [194.196.210.3]) by flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA17271 for <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 03:52:17 -0500 Received: from clbmx01.INTRA.CLB.NL (clbmx01.clb.nl [172.16.1.5]) by clbin01 (2.6 Build 1 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA00735; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:50:05 +0100 Received: by clbmx01.clb.nl with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1461.28) id <YM7VNYGV>; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:50:06 +0100 Message-ID: <633112D354E6D111BA540008C724D264CBBA51@clbmx01.clb.nl> From: "Voorn, John" <J_Voorn@CLB.nl> To: cyto-inbox Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu> Subject: Not an used Q-Prep machine but a new PeliLyset machine Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:50:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1461.28) Content-Type: text/plain Dear Victoria, Sorry we do not have an old Q-prep machine for you but we do offer new PeliLyset machines which do the same job, only better. The Pelilyset machine is suitable for both Coulter and BD flow cytometers, the lysing is based on a gentle pH shock which gives a better separation between debris and cells. If you are interested you can find more information on our web site on page : http://www.clb.nl/CLBweb/CLBreag.nsf/80a14753492b8ba6c12564f800301940/dfaaa0 71d8691487c1256673004bc107?OpenDocument <http://www.clb.nl/CLBweb/CLBreag.nsf/80a14753492b8ba6c12564f800301940/dfaaa 071d8691487c1256673004bc107?OpenDocument> Best regards, John John Voorn CLB Reagents Productmanager Plesmanlaan 125 j_voorn@clb.nl <mailto:j_voorn@clb.nl> 1066CX AMSTERDAM the Netherlands tel +31-(0)20 5123246 fax +31-(0)20 5123570 web site www.clb.nl <www.clb.nl> -----Original Message----- From: vbsmith@UNMC.EDU [SMTP:vbsmith@UNMC.EDU] Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 11:25 PM To: Cytometry Mailing List Subject: used Q-Prep machine Hello, Our lab would like to purchase a used q-prep machine (coulter). If anyone has any info, please e-mail us at: vbsmith@unmc.edu Thank you and Happy New Year, Victoria Boryca Smith University of Nebraska Medical Center



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:54:23 EST