BCECF and SNARF comparison

From: Gyorgy Lustyik (lustyik@apacs.pote.hu)
Date: Mon Aug 09 1999 - 13:12:58 EST


Greetings,

We use BCECF AM and carboxy SNARF-1 AM for intracellular pH
measurements with a FACS Calibur. The FL1/FL3 ratio is used for BCECF
and the FL3/FL2 ratio for SNARF. The calibration method is the high
K+/nigericin technique.

Recently we made a comparison and found that the resting pHi of K562
cells was 6.72 if measured with BCECF and 7.01 (average values) if
measured with SNARF under the same experimental conditions. This is
almost an 0.3 units difference that we can hardly explain.
Autofluorescence signals are small at all wavelengths compared to the
SNARF or BCECF fluorescence intensities.

Has anyone had similar experiences with these or other pH dyes/cell
lines? Explanation, suggestions, comments will be greatly appreciated. 

Thank you in advance,

Laszlo Grama
PhD student
gramal@apacs.pote.hu


University Medical School of Pecs
Institute of Biophysics
Szigeti ut 12.
H-7643 Pecs, HUNGARY
Tel/Fax: (36) 72 314017



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:49 EST