Re: FSP-turbo sort option

From: Joe Trotter (trotter@scripps.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 25 1999 - 10:15:36 EST


Dear Ted,

	We have a FACStar Plus upgraded as yours and two Vantage SE
systems with TurboSort at Scripps. So, it is easy for us to compare what
TSO does and what the SE electronics do to complement TSO. One huge
improvement over the older system is the 1/10 drop clock, allowing
the 'pure sort' circuits to have a more precise handle on the events
in time. This will allow you to tune the system for better efficiency
and reduce the drop deflection envelope - so your yields will go up
with a well tuned system (using a 1.4 -> 1.5 drop deflection envelope).

	In multi-laser mode, the SE will surpass the modified Plus
at most any speed because of the digital electronics. Still, you
ought to be able to see a significant increase over the previous
electronics in terms of recovery (where the older circuits could
lose much more than expected due to hidden dead-times). So, for
hi-speed sorting in your modified system, you should try to keep
critical sorts single laser for maximum recovery. If you need to
do multi-laser sorts, you should slow down a little if recovery
becomes the main issue.  

	The range of frequencies and rates we use vary all over the
place depending on the task at hand, so I think that goes beyond
a response here. Please feel free to contact us if you want detailed
setup parameters we tend to use on our 'Plus with TSO.


		Regards,

		Joe

Joe Trotter 
Director, Flow Cytometry
Mailstop Imm-20
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 North Torrey Pines Rd.
La Jolla, California 92037



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:39 EST