Re: Intracellular staining

From: Keith Bahjat (kbahjat@ufl.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 20 1999 - 14:55:57 EST


Two comments,

First is that it appears for most cytokines, monensin is the more robust
transport inhibitor. A nice comparison can be seen in a number of different
Pharmingen publications now circulating. We have noted the same differences in
our lab both with human and murine lymphocytes.

Point number two deals with use of CD3 and CD28 for stimulation. First, you want
to allow the cells to activate without a transport inhibitor (I think 2 to 4
hours is typical). Add the transport inhibitor after the cells have had some
time to activate. This gives the cells time to cycle TCR's and prompt a strong
response (read Lonzavecchia's Nature paper on serial triggering to understand
this necessity).

Hope this helps and good luck

Keith Bahjat
Graduate Assistant
University of Florida
College of Medicine
kbahjat@ufl.edu


Qi, Hai wrote:

> Some of you may be doing intracellular staining for cytokines. I am
> particularly interested in staining mouse lymphocytes under conditions as
> close to ex vivo as possible. I am comparing cytokine responses of normal
> and infected mice. My experience with PMA and ionomycin plus brefeldin A was
> that relatively higher frequencies of cytokine-producing cells could be
> obtained, but the difference between normal and infected mice seemed
> obscured. I tried Ag and anti-CD28 plus brefeldin A as in vitro activation,
> the frequency of positively stained cells was below 1% and such a number was
> hard to reproduce.
>
> Wish to hear from you, and we can discuss more details. Thanks in advance.
>
> Hai Qi
> Dept. of Pathology, UTMB






This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:23 EST