Re: AUL vs AML Mo

From: by way of Rafael Nunez (CNunez7777@aol.com)
Date: Sat Jan 24 1998 - 04:46:39 EST


Mike:
In relationship to your case, I believe that is a real challenge.
Although there are more opinions that favor an AML MO, I will like to propose
in consideration an AUL type IV or V based in these facts: Mike's case showed
CD33 and MPO negativity with dim CD13. I will like to see CD33 dim or clear
positivity for AML MO. But, it is not the case. In the other hand, there is
CD7 and TdT positivity with other T cell markers negatives that "may" suggest
an early T cell differentiation.
Also, It is DR positive with other B cell markers negative. So, there is not
clear lineage definition although there is evidence that the malignant clone
start to differentiate. AUL type V (with CD7 + and negative  CD4 and CD8)  is
associated clinically with bulky disease, mediastinal widening, leukocytosis.
BM transplant will be the best treatment.
I agree with Anita that is important to exclude very early B or megacaryocytic
compromise, although as she wrote it is unlikely.
I believe that this case in one of those that will create different opinions,
all of them very interesting and will be important to know either molecular
and cytogenetic
studies that can complement our comments and in that way our understanding
of these atypical phenotypes will be better for future cases.

I will like to take this opportunity to inform my colleagues that I have moved
from Manchester, England to the MD Anderson, Houston.

Sincerely:
Cesar Nunez, MD
Department of Pediatrics
MD Anderson Cancer Center



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:51:42 EST