Re: conjugation vs. sandwich -Reply

From: John Ladasky (ladasky@leland.Stanford.EDU)
Date: Thu Mar 27 1997 - 21:46:07 EST


> It is far easier to use a sandwich technique, if your primary antibody is
> unconjugated.  This can be successfully used even with 2 and 3 color stain-
> ing.
> Trying to conjugate an antibody is time consuming and expensive if you are
> buying the unlabeled antibody.  You need sufficient antibody to start - at
> least 100 ug and 1 mg would be better.  After conjugating you must remove
> excess FITC, unconjugated and over conjugated antibody.  
> 
> If you need protocols for sandwich techniques, I'd be happy to send them.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tony Bakke
> bakkea@ohsu.edu

	Is this always a better idea?  I did an experiment a while back in
which I used indirect ("sandwich") staining with an antibody against MHC
class I.  By the time I got around to the analysis, the light scatter prop-
erties of the cells that were positive for my antibody were all out of whack,
as if I had stimulated them.  It reminded me of a technique I once used for
stimulating T cells, in which you added anti-CD3-biotin and then streptavidin.

	So, if cross-linking the antigen in question would stimulate your 
cells, perhaps you want to use direct-labeled antibodies.  Comments?

							- John Ladasky
						  ladasky@leland.stanford.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:49:36 EST