Re: RE: best long-term data storage???

From: Ivan T. Shaw (ishaw@po-box.mcgill.ca)
Date: Sun Mar 16 1997 - 13:38:53 EST


At 07:24 PM 3/14/97 -0500, <ClaudeC81@aol.com> wrote:
>Optical IS dead, too expensive any way you slice it, and far to slow.  Why
>compromise the speed you paid for when you bought your computer with a
>lethargic drive?  Claude

Optical is NOT dead. If you have a need to do long-term storage, it's one
of the few storage technologies available that's proven its reliability in
the field (NASA's JPL for instance is using CDR to store probe images).

Optical however, is not the best-suited technology for short-term or
immediate storage needs. Hardware such as ZIPs and EZ-Flyers have the
budgetary edge.


- ivan

======================================================================
Ivan T. Shaw                      | Tel: (514) 398-3002
Montreal Neurological Institute   | FAX: (514) 398-8540 
3801 University                   | e-mail: ishaw@po-box.mcgill.ca
Montreal, Quebec, CANADA  H3A 2B4 | http://132.206.201.7/ivan/ivan.htm
======================================================================



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:49:33 EST