Sorting Cryptosporidium Oocysts

From: Moss, Delynn M. (dmm3@CIDDPD2.EM.CDC.GOV)
Date: Fri Jan 31 1997 - 10:22:00 EST


J. Peter Bercz sent the following message and questions:

Problem Statement:  In  wanting to
determine the minimally infective dose
(oral route in a neonatal mouse model as
well as in a human colon tumor cell line) of
cryptosporidium oocysts, we must obtain
highly accurately sorted and calibrated
pure cyst suspensions from crude density
gradient preps.  Main contaminants in
crude are yeasts.

We have a highly specififc FITC-MAB,
fluor tagging of cysts has been well
worked out.

We have a Coulter Epics Elite  equipped
with the SPE fast sorter and autoclone,
we are experienced sorters. ( We also
have a Meridian ULTIMA confocal scope
as an adjunct tool)

My inquiry is about:

1. Does anyone have experience with flow
sorting and/or confocal mapping of
protozoan oocysts, about potential
problems and technical tricks, etc?

2. Would FITC-MAB tagging and flow
sorting of oocysts  have an adverse
impact on cyst viability, infectivity
and virulence?

3. Do I need to worry about aerosol-borne
 infectious control.

Any advice or dialogue  will be greatly
appreciated.

In reply, we have not sorted oocysts but see no reason why this can not be 
done.  We also have a MAb reactive with oocysts that gives a very good FITC 
signal.  It would seem that sorting on MAb-FITC labeled oocysts would yield 
a very pure population.  However, we have no information on the effects of 
bound MAb-FITC on viability or infectivity.  If viability is not affected, 
then I would think virulence is not affected.  This question may be answered 
by inoculating  neonatal mice or by using simple excystation procedures. 
 Possibly another option is to sort the oocysts using FSC and SSC parameters 
in log mode.  Since Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts are 4 - 6 microns, they 
are separated from bacteria, microsporidia, and some yeast.  We have no FSC 
& SSC profiles on yeast that are the same size as oocysts, but hopefullly 
their SSC profiles would be different than oocysts.  If this is the case, 
 you would still obtain a pure population.  I'm sure that most personnel do 
not want infectious oocysts in aerosol form in their laboratory.


Good Luck

Delynn M. Moss
Centers for Disease Control
Parasitic Diseases Division



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:49:20 EST