Ring Trials Thrombocyte Immunephenotyping

Quality Control and Standardization of
Flow Cytometric Platelet Analysis

3rd Ring Trial (1995)

Quantitative Analysis of Surface Glycoprotein Expression

AG Klin.Zytometrie, Regensburg, Germany

S. Barlage, G. Rothe, G. Schmitz
Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
University of Regensburg
Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11
D-93042 Regensburg
Tel: +49/941/944-6204
Fax: +49/941/944-6202
E-mail: Gregor.Rothe@klinik.uni-regensburg.de

Participating Laboratories: 9

Problems of Clinical Thrombocyte Analysis:
The results of thrombocyte functional assays are highly dependent on:
- methodological aspects because of:
- platelet instability and artificial activation during handling and storage
- complexity of different sample preparation techniques
- heterogeneity of platelet light scatter characteristics in whole blood
- variability of antibody clones and conjugates
- differences between flow cytometer for light scatter signals, amplifiers and optical filters

Aims of Quality Assessment Ring Trial:
- interlaboratory comparison of quantitative surface glycoproteins analysis using high (CD41a, CD42b) or low expression density (CD62) antigens in a dual color assay
- interlaboratory standardization of platelet activation analysis

- aliquots of a platelet concentrate and of whole blood, each sample native and in-vitro activated. All samples were stabilized by mild fixation.
- fluorescent beads with a protocol for instrument setup
- fluorescent beads with calibrated mouse antibody binding for the calculation of antibody binding sites
- standard protocol notes for sample preparation and analysis of CD41a-PE (GpIIb/IIIa) in combination with CD42b-FITC (GpIb) or CD62-FITC (GMP-140) requiring the use of laboratory-specific reagents

- samples were successfully analyzed within 24h by all participants according to the standard protocol
- list mode data revealed comparable light scatter characteristics and staining properties of the platelets
- the determination of antibody-binding sites reduced the inter-laboratory variability in comparison to arbitrary fluorescence intensities
- although the flow cytometric measurements were very comparable amongst the participants, the methods of data analysis were highly variable
- the overall variability of results was greater for low density CD62 than for high density CD41a or CD42b. The variability was also higher for whole blood samples as compared to platelet concentrates
- further standardization of the protocols will be necessary to improve the as yet insufficient interlaboratory comparability of the complex thrombocyte activation assay

Antibody Calibration
(curves: laboratories #1-9)

Total Antibody Binding

Number of Antibody Binding Sites

For problems or comments, please contact:
G.Valet, E-mail: valet@vms.biochem.mpg.de, Max-Planck-Institut für Biochemie, Am Klopferspitz 18a, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany, Tel: +49/89/8578-2518, -2525, Fax: +49/89/8578-2563
INTERNET address: http://www.biochem.mpg.de/valet/cytorel.html
Last Update: Aug.28, 1996