![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Catalog |
Description
|
Product Information Sheet Available | |
PKH67-GL |
PKH67 Green
Fluorescent Cell Linker Kit |
![]() | |
PKH2-GL |
PKH2 Green Fluorescent
Cell Linker Kit |
![]() | |
PKH2-PCL |
PKH2 Green Fluorescent
Cell Linker Kit |
||
PKH26-GL |
PKH26 Red Fluorescent
Cell Linker Kit |
![]() | |
PKH26-PCL |
PKH26 Red Fluorescent
Cell Linker Kit
|
||
CCPS-1 |
|||
GL-DIL |
Diluent A Kit for PKH2-GL |
||
PCL-DIL |
Diluent B Kit for PKH2-PCL and PKH26-PCL |
||
CGL-DIL |
Diluent C Kit for PKH26-GL and PKH67 |
||
U.S. Patent Numbers: 4,783,401; 4,762,701;
4,859,584. Distributed for Phanos Technologies. |
|
Catalog Information PKH67 Green Fluorescent Cell Linker Kit, Catalog No. PKH67-GL is for general cell membrane labeling. It has
a longer aliphatic carbon tail than PKH1 and PKH2, two other green dyes
previously described for in vitro and in vivo cell
tracking.1-4 Based on the longer tail length, in-house
studies have consistently shown reduced cell-cell transfer for PKH67 as
compared
to PKH2.5 |
|
|
PKH2 Green Fluorescent Cell Linker Kit, Catalog No. PKH2-GL is for general cell membrane labeling. It has
been characterized in a number of model systems and has been found to be
useful
for in vitro cell labeling, in vitro proliferation studies and
short term, in vivo cell tracking.6-9
The half-life for elution of PKH2 from labeled rabbit red blood cells is 10-11
days. This slow elution may complicate interpretation of experiments assessing
in vivo proliferation. |
|
|
PKH2 Green Fluorescent Cell Linker Kit, Catalog No. PKH2-PCL is for phagocytic cell labeling. It is used to
selectively label cells with phagocytic capabilities such as monocytes,
macrophages, or neutrophils.1,10,11 The
labeling occurs through the formation of dye aggregates or particulates. The
aggregate formation significantly inhibits the uptake of dye by non-phagocytic
cells, such as lymphocytes, but facilitates dye uptake by phagocytic cells.
Labeled cells appear patchy or spotted because the dye is localized in
phagocytic compartments of the cells. The dye appears to be resistant to
metabolic attack and has been found to remain with the cells for more than 21
days in vivo.
|
|
|
PKH26 Red Fluorescent Cell Linker Kit, Catalog No. PKH26-GL is for general cell membrane labeling. It has
been characterized in a number of model systems and has been found to be
useful
for in vitro cell labeling, in vitro proliferation studies and
long term, in vivo cell tracking.6,9The
half-life for elution of PKH26 from labeled rabbit red blood cells is greater
than 100 days. This enhanced stability is favorable for long term in
vivo
studies. |
|
|
PKH26 Red Fluorescent Cell Linker Kit, Catalog No. PKH26-PCL is for phagocytic cell labeling. It is used to
selectively label cells with phagocytic capabilities such as monocytes,
macrophages or neutrophils.1,10,11The
labeling occurs through the formation of dye aggregates or particulates. The
aggregate formation significantly inhibits the uptake of dye by non-phagocytic
cells, such as lymphocytes, but facilitates dye uptake by phagocytic cells.
Labeled cells appear patchy or spotted because the dye is localized in
phagocytic compartments of the cells. The dye appears to be resistant to
metabolic attack and has been found to remain with the cells for at least 21
days in vivo.
|
|
|
1. Melnicoff, M.J., et al., J. Leuk. Biol., 44, 367 (1988). 2. Teare, G., et al., Cell Immunol., 134, 157 (1990). 3. Slezak, S., and Horan, P., J. Immunol. Meth., 177, 205 (1989). 4. Unpublished data, Zynaxis, Inc. and Sigma Chemical Co. 5. Unpublished data, Zynaxis, Inc. 6. Slezak, S., and Horan, P., Blood, 74, (6), 2171 (1990). 7. Samlowski, W., et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 144, 101 (1991). 8. Hugo, P., et al., Nature, 360, 679 (1992). 9. Messina, L., et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, (24), 12018 (1992). 10. Melnicoff, M.J., et al., J. Leuk. Biol., 43, 387 (1988). 11. Melnicoff, M.J., et al., Cellular Immunol., 118, 178 (1989). |
|
|
CCPS-1 The Cell Census PlusTM System, Catalog No. CCPS-1 The Cell Census Plus System is a cell proliferation assay for flow cytometry. Using flow cytometry, Cell Census Plus simultaneously measures cell proliferation of phenotypically distinct subsets of cells within a heterogeneous population. CELL CENSUS PLUSTM:
Cell Census Plus contains a red fluorescent
dye to label the cell's membrane, microbeads to standardize instrument setup
and
normalize cell counts and software, the cell proliferation model, to interpret
the histogram data. |
|
|
The Cell Census PlusTM System 1. Prelabeling of cells with PKH26 dye 2. Cell proliferation in culture 3. Label cells with antibody (Immunophenotyping) 4. Data acquisition on flow cytometer 5. Data analysis using software |
|
|
The Cell Census Plus process is simple. First,
label the entire cell population before exposing it to the proliferation
stimulus. The cells are now ready for culture. After proliferation, the cells
may be labeled with specific antibodies so that the proliferating activities
of
specific subpopulations may be studied. Next, ModFit (Verity Software) is used
to analyze the data. ModFit is a computer program that deconvolutes raw
histogram data into peaks. Each peak represents a generation. The Cell
Proliferation Model software provides the parameters for ModFit to perform the
histogram deconvolution. It then calculates the proliferation index, a ratio
of
the total number of cells analyzed versus the calculated number of parental
cells required to generate the observed cell number. ModFit and The Cell
Proliferation Model program can deconvolute histograms for up to ten
generations
and give the following numerical values: Number of cell divisions, Percent of
cells in each generation for up to 10 generations, Proliferation index based
on
these percentages, Non-proliferating fraction, and Reduced chi-square as a
measure of the goodness of fit. Each Kit Contains:
|
|
|
1. Horan, P., and Slezak, S., Nature, 340, 167 (1989). 2. Slezak, S., and Horan, P., Blood, 74, 2171 (1990). 3. Samlowski, W., et al., J. Immunol. Meth.,144, 101 (1991). 4. Hugo, P., et al., Nature, 360, 679 (1992). 5. Messina, L., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 12018 (1992). |