 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Keith Bahjat
Chicago, IL
>Well, we have used both CyChrome and PcP, and we like PcP. CyChrome was
>very bright and made compensation a nightmare, whereas PcP was dimmer,
>yet this resulted in much easier compensation. BD FACscan one laser is
>the machine we use.
>CAVEAT: PcP is VERY expensive.
>cya
>BZ
>ps your milage may vary, I was told that noone in thier right mind would
>want to use the "dimmer" PcP, yet the results we get are very nice thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, steven micko wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 09:02:46 EST
>> From: steven micko <steven_micko@email.eushc.org>
>> To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
>> Subject: CyChrome & PerCP
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone give me information on the chemical structure (in a general
>> way), excitation/emission information, and stability information on the
>> two fluorochromes, CyChrome (Pharmingen) and PerCP (B-D)? I'm not
>> interested in violating anybody's proprietary information. I just want to
>> know what I'm dealing with. So far all I have been able to get is
>> marketing stuff (i.e. ours is better than theirs).
>>
>> Is there anything in the literature?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Steve Micko
>> Emory Hospital
>> Atlanta
>>
-- Keith Bahjat Northwestern University Kbahjat@nwu.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD-ROM Vol 3 was produced by Monica M. Shively and other staff at the
Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge
as an educational service to the cytometry community.
If you have any comments please direct them to
Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director,
PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Phone: (765)-494-0757;
FAX(765) 494-0517;
Web